Public Domain Under Italian and European Copyright Law: When Works Become Free to Use

Last updated: September 2026 — by Avv. Claudia Roggero, Rome Bar since 2003, entertainment and copyright law, DANDI.media

In Italy, a work out of copyright is not necessarily free to use. Two layers survive the expiry of economic rights: moral rights, which are perpetual and enforceable by heirs, and the Cultural Heritage Code, which can require authorisation and a fee to reproduce commercially an artwork that has been out of copyright for centuries.

That is the part foreign producers, publishers and platforms get wrong. The duration arithmetic is the easy half; the Italian overlay is where clearances fail.

This guide sets out both: how to calculate whether a work has entered the public domain under Italian and EU law, and what still restricts its use once it has.

In this guide

• The general rule: 70 years post mortem
• Duration by work category
• Films: why the release year tells you nothing
• Photographs and the 2025 reform
• Cultural heritage: public domain that is not free
• Moral rights: the perpetual layer
• Traps that revive rights in an expired work
• Public domain is territorial
• A working checklist
• Frequently asked questions
• How DANDI supports clients

The general rule: 70 years post mortem

Under Article 25 LDA, economic rights last for the author’s life plus 70 years, harmonised across the Union by Directive 2006/116/EC.

The clock starts on 1 January of the year following the author’s death. An author who died in 2025 sees their works enter the public domain on 1 January 2096.

For works of joint authorship, the term runs from 1 January following the death of the last surviving co-author (Article 26 LDA). Collective works are calculated separately under Article 27.

Duration by work category

Note the phonogram rule carefully: the headline “70 years” applies only to phonograms that were lawfully published or communicated within 50 years of fixation. An unpublished recording follows the shorter term.

Films: why the release year tells you nothing

A film’s term runs from the death of the last survivor among four statutory co-authors — the director, the author of the subject, the screenwriter and the composer of the original music (Articles 32 and 44 LDA).

The consequence for Italian classic cinema is that release dates are close to useless as a guide. A film released in 1950 whose composer lived until 2010 remains protected until 2081.

And the film as a whole is only the first layer. Each of these can carry its own separate term:

• the source novel or play, running from its own author’s death;
• the screenplay, where the writer’s term outlasts the film’s;
• pre-existing music on the soundtrack, with the composition and the recording running separately;
• a restoration, where the restored version may attract protection of its own.

A film in the public domain does not mean every element within it is. See our guide to copyrightable elements in film.

Photographs and the 2025 reform

Italian law splits photographs into two categories with different regimes:

• Photographic works (opere fotografiche) — where the image reflects the photographer’s creative choices. Full copyright, 70 years from the author’s death.
• Simple photographs (fotografie semplici) — documentary images of persons, objects or nature below the creative threshold. A related right, now 70 years from creation under Law 182/2025, extended from the previous 20 years.

This is the most disruptive recent change for archive-based work. Material that had fallen out of the 20-year term, and which productions have treated as free for years, may now sit inside a 70-year one. Any clearance analysis on Italian historical photography carried out before the reform should be redone rather than relied on.

The distinction between the two categories is itself a judgement call, and it decides which term applies. Where the assessment is close, it is worth taking a position and documenting it rather than assuming the lower tier.

Cultural heritage: public domain that is not free

This is the Italian rule with no equivalent in most jurisdictions, and the one that most often surprises foreign clients.

Under the Cultural Heritage Code (D.Lgs. 42/2004), works held in state collections or classified as cultural heritage are subject to a separate authorisation regime that operates independently of copyright:

• Commercial reproduction of an item held by a state museum, archive, library or archaeological site may require authorisation from the competent authority;
• Concession fees can be charged, even where the work is centuries old and unquestionably out of copyright;
• Non-commercial use — study, research, free expression, creative activity — is generally permitted, subject to formal requirements;
• the regime applies to the physical item held by the institution, not to the underlying intellectual creation.

In practice this means a Renaissance painting or a classical sculpture, plainly in the public domain as a matter of copyright, can still require authorisation before it appears on a product, in an advertising campaign or on a commercial cover. Italian courts have upheld institutions asserting this against commercial uses of works in their collections, including well-known litigation brought by Florentine institutions.

The framework is contested — its compatibility with EU law, and with Article 14 of the DSM Directive on reproductions of public domain visual art, is argued in both directions. For a production, that debate is not a plan. The practical position is that Italian institutions do assert these rights, and the authorisation route is faster than the argument.

Moral rights: the perpetual layer

Moral rights do not expire with economic rights. Under Articles 20–24 LDA, attribution and integrity survive indefinitely after the author’s death and are enforceable by the heirs identified in Article 23 — spouse and children first, then parents and descendants, then siblings and theirs. Where a public interest requires it, the State can act as well.

For a public domain work this means:

• commercial reproduction is permitted — the economic rights are gone;
• attribution to the original author must be preserved;
• distortion or mutilation prejudicing the author’s honour or reputation remains actionable, however long ago they died;
• AI generation in the style of a public domain author still has to respect attribution and integrity.

The classic illustration is the Huston colourisation litigation in France: economic rights were not the issue, and the heirs still prevailed. The same logic applies in Italy.

See our case study on moral rights of heirs.

Traps that revive rights in an expired work

Four situations regularly turn a confident public domain conclusion into an infringement.

1. Translations. A translation is a protected work in its own right, with its own author and its own term. The original may be free while the translation you are actually using is not — a frequent problem with foreign classics circulating in standard Italian editions.
2. Critical and scientific editions. Italian law grants a separate right to the publisher of a critical or scientific edition of a public domain work. Using the edition rather than the underlying text engages that right.
3. Restorations and new arrangements. A restored film, a new engraving, a new musical arrangement of a public domain composition — each can attract fresh protection in the new contribution.
4. Term extensions applied retrospectively. When Italy moved from 50 to 70 years, works that had already lapsed were brought back into protection. Law 182/2025 has done the same for simple photographs. A work that was free when you last checked may not be free now, and older clearance memoranda should be treated as evidence of a past position rather than a current one.

Public domain is territorial

There is no such thing as global public domain status. Copyright is territorial: a work can be free in the United States and protected in Italy, or the reverse.

The differences arise from different terms, different rules on when the clock starts, different treatment of unpublished and anonymous works, and — in the US — a registration and renewal history that has no Italian equivalent.

For a production, the practical rule is that the analysis follows the distribution plan. A clearance valid for a US release says nothing about an Italian one, and a multi-territory release needs the check repeated for each territory where protection will be claimed.

A working checklist

1. Identify every author and contributor — for films, all four statutory co-authors; for books, translators and editors; for music, composer, lyricist and performers.
2. Verify dates of death, from a reliable source rather than an encyclopaedia entry.
3. Apply the category rule, not the general one — films, phonograms and simple photographs each run differently.
4. Check every embedded element separately — source work, music, archive material, restoration.
5. Check for cultural heritage classification under D.Lgs. 42/2004 where the item sits in an Italian public collection.
6. Assess moral rights exposure, particularly where the intended use modifies, satirises or recontextualises.
7. Repeat for each distribution territory.
8. Document the analysis. E&O underwriters ask for the reasoning, not the conclusion.

Frequently asked questions

When does a work enter the public domain in Italy?

Generally 70 years after the author’s death, counted from 1 January of the year following death. Films run from the death of the last surviving statutory co-author; simple photographs run 70 years from creation; phonograms follow their own rule.

Is a public domain work free to use in Italy?

Not necessarily. Two layers survive the expiry of economic rights: perpetual moral rights of attribution and integrity, enforceable by heirs, and the Cultural Heritage Code, which can require authorisation and a fee for commercial reproduction of items held in Italian public collections.

Why do I need authorisation for a Renaissance painting?

Because the Cultural Heritage Code regulates the reproduction of the physical item held by the institution, separately from copyright in the underlying work. Commercial reproduction of an item in a state museum can require authorisation and payment of a concession fee, regardless of the work’s age.

How do I calculate the term for an Italian film?

70 years from the death of the last survivor among the director, the author of the subject, the screenwriter and the composer of the original music. The release year is not a useful guide: a 1950 film can remain protected into the 2080s.

What changed for photographs in 2025?

Law 182/2025 extended protection of simple photographs from 20 years to 70 years from creation. Material previously treated as free may now be protected, and clearance analysis carried out before the reform should be redone.

Can I modify a public domain work?

Commercially reproducing it, yes. But the author’s right of integrity is perpetual, so modifications that distort or mutilate the work in a way prejudicing the author’s honour or reputation remain actionable by the heirs, and attribution must be preserved.

Is a work in the public domain everywhere at once?

No. Copyright is territorial, and terms and starting points differ between countries. A work can be free in the United States and protected in Italy. The analysis has to be run for every territory in the distribution plan.

Can public domain works be used to train AI?

Copyright does not stand in the way, and there is no rightsholder opt-out to consider. But moral rights of attribution and integrity persist, and cultural heritage restrictions apply to reproductions of items in Italian public collections.

What about translations of public domain books?

The translation is a protected work with its own author and its own term. An original text can be free while the translation in circulation is not — a common trap with foreign classics in standard Italian editions.

How DANDI supports clients

DANDI.media advises producers, publishers, museums, platforms and creators on public domain analysis and use:

• Status verification for specific works, documented to the standard E&O underwriters expect
• Cross-territory duration analysis for international distribution
• Cultural heritage authorisations — assessing whether D.Lgs. 42/2004 applies and handling the authorisation route
• Moral rights clearance for adaptations, restorations and satirical or transformative uses
• AI training and generation using public domain material
• Reassessment after Law 182/2025 for archives and productions relying on earlier photographic clearances

We work in English, Italian and French, and act regularly for foreign productions and for foreign law firms needing Italian-law input on a wider clearance.

Book an initial consultation with Avv. Claudia Roggero.

Related guides

This guide states the position at the date above. Terms and classifications change, and public domain status should be verified at the time of use.

Dandi Law Firm provides legal assistance in several Practice Areas. Check out our Services or contact Us!